Tuesday, 21 March 2006

Trying to understand lawyers...

I couldn’t be a lawyer but after watching this videoI’ve broadened my horizons :) and at least I can understand some of their decisions or to be precise why they have to be so calculating.

Monday, 27 February 2006

Do you need a tool that supports Contrac First approach - try WSCF 0.6!!!

Great guys from Thinktecture just released WSCF 0.6 for Visual Studio 2005 and .NET 2.0. I’ve been using it for a while and it saves lots of tedious, manual work. Give a try and you won’t regret!

Saturday, 25 February 2006

Experience = Knowledge?

Nearly every job offer contains something like that: salary based on experience. It means that the more years of experience you have the better professional you are. It sounds reasonably but of course from time to time it’s not true and you always should check out skills of a person who applies for a job. It sounds reasonably too but I’ve been involved in more then 10 recruitment processes and only during literally 2 of them employer wanted to check my knowledge. The rest of them wanted to know only how many years/months of experience I have. They didn’t ask any technical questions, nothing. It’s incomprehensible, isn’t it?

Thursday, 23 February 2006

Attending conference isn't equivalent to taking a break.

Very good article about how to approach personal development in the field of technology. It arrived just in time because I’m going to participate in Microsoft Architect Forum in Dublin and I can leverage some tips of Douglas.

Friday, 3 February 2006

Resonable comparison of a few AJAX frameworks for .NET

The comparison can be found here. It seems to be quite good and useful but there is one interesting thing. Author of the review is at the same time author of one of the analyzed frameworks. And his library seems to be the best one. Coincidence? Who knows :).

Friday, 13 January 2006

Java is great language but teaching ONLY Java is bad idea.

Joel’s article says that teaching Java is bad idea. Many people have disagreed because according to them every language is equally good. I think they didn’t catch the main idea that is behind the article. Java isn't good because it doesn’t require you to think too much. You don’t have to know what happens under the hood when you write particular line of code. In this case C or even C++ is much better. I agree you have to have some knowledge in order to write a program but to be honest very often if your code compiles then it works. Of course it can be slow, memory consuming and crash encountering marginal conditions but it will work more or less. From business point of view Java and C# are great languages but I think that you still HAVE to know what is really going on when you write code. IT systems are almost everywhere and they are taking over more and more human activities in many fields. Maybe I am wrong but I would NOT like to find out software bug at the moment when my life/future/animal/money/t-shirt is fully dependent on it.